top of page

How My Masters Courses Impacted My Teaching

 A Little Background

          My goal as an educator is to always be the best teacher I can be for my students. They deserve the very best education as a quality education can change their lives. I was fortunate enough to have exceptional teachers while I was a student and I want to extend this to my students. Part of being the best teacher I can be is to continue to learn about the best practices and research about the areas in which I teach. Through my work on my Masters of Art in Education I have further developed my skills so I can become the best teacher I can be for my students.

English Language Learners

           As I selected courses to take during my MAED and saw a course called TE 845 Language Diversity and Literacy Instruction I knew I needed to take the course. My first year of teaching was in a classroom consisting mostly of students who didn’t speak English at home and I wanted to be more prepared when I taught students like this again. I was hoping the course would help me to teach the English Language Learners I had in my classroom at the time and help me further develop my skills for teaching ELLs in the future. In the end I learned about concepts to further my understanding of ELLs and made changes to my instruction to meet their needs.

            I learned in this course that students with a strong first language and highly educated parents have different needs than students who have had long periods of inconsistent schooling or weak first language literacy skills according to Ester J. de Jong (de Jong, 2010). This concept resonated with my current teaching demographics. Since my school is located in the same town as a university, our students that are ELL often are very proficient in their home language and their parents are highly educated.  In my experience with these parents in my classroom is that they are very eager for their student to learn English and wish to support them as best as they can. This insight into ELLs and their parents shifted my idea of an ELL. I had seen all ELLs as immigrants or as Freeman and Freeman state “Involuntary Minority Students” who had limited education (Freeman & Freeman, 2002). This is true for some ELLs, but not the population I had in my classroom and I had to change my thinking to be more open minded about the family background of my students. Thus it is important to learn about the family and language background of any ELLs I have in my classroom.

            After taking this course I have made a few changes to how I teach my ELLs. First, I try to meet with them in small groups as often as I can during my language arts instruction. Any comprehension strategy, for example, is taught in the whole group but then I meet with a group consisting of my two ELLs and three other students. We practice applying the strategy to the story together. This gives me the chance to hear them talk about reading and their understanding. I learned that it is important for ELLs to talk about and discuss what they are reading.  I also learned ELLs need to read and read often. Thus, I encourage these students to read as often as they can in class.  I have made my small group time less structured for the students not meeting with me to encourage all my students to read or free write. While I made these changes with my ELLs in mind, all my students have benefitted. At the end of this course, I left feeling more sympathetic for ELLs and understanding of their experiences and am more prepared to meet their needs.

unknown.png
Countries in blue are locations my ELLs came from.

Mathematics

           Three times a year my students take an online assessment called the North West Education Assessment and each time I fret over my students’ math scores. Does the assessment match what I taught? Will they be able to apply what they learned? Perhaps the answer was in my math instruction methods. This is why I decided to take the course TE 855 Teaching School Mathematics. My view of mathematics instruction changed after taking this course and has left me reflecting on how to support my students to be able to complete math problems with many solution methods.

            The most profound change to me ideas about mathematics was in regards to the traditional textbook approach to math instruction. This is the method I was taught and is the method I use to teach today. Students are taught using problems in a book and then practice problems in workbooks. But research has found this approach has its drawbacks, as students do not perform as well on assessments because they are required to determine what the question is asking and what procedure to apply. When they learn through this textbook approach they find it difficult to apply concepts (Boaler, 1998). This new information made me question my current method of teaching and challenged me to think about how to best help my students learn to apply their mathematics understanding.

            I also learned about different types of math knowledge. Being able to solve problems requires Conceptual, Procedural and Procedural Flexibility according to Rittle-Johnson (Rittle-Johnson, 2017). Conceptual knowledge is knowledge of the concepts in the problem. Procedural knowledge is knowing the procedures and the actions to take and Procedural Flexibility is knowing more than one type of procedure for solving a problem. Students need all three to Do Math or when students know what to do and when with no clear path to the solution. As I have reflected, I have concluded I am not getting my students to Doing Math yet. I need to further develop my teaching methods to build up students’ three types of knowledge so they can tackle math tasks with no specific sequence of steps for solving them. Without taking this course I would not have analyzed my instruction and lessons with this viewpoint. 

           An assignment in this course helped me to organize all the information I had learned about math understanding and knowledge. Through creating the chart I was able to see how all the ideas I learned about were connected and lead to students Doing Math. I see how different ways of understanding require different types of knowledge.  I also can visualize how the types of knowledge are related to different types of tasks. Now I reflect on this diagram and remind myself of what I have learned to ensure I am working towards my goal of students Doing Math. In conclusion, TE 855 brought to my attention the goal I want for my students to do math and to attain different types of math knowledge. 

Math Concepts Map.jpg

Vocabulary and Comprehension

​

           One of the motivating factors when beginning my master program was the newly passed Michigan law requiring kindergarten through third grade students whom are not proficient in reading to have a formal plan in place to help them become proficient (Michigan Department of Education). It became more important to me to further develop my reading and language arts instruction methods to help support my students. Thus, I chose literacy as the focus of my masters. I selected to take the course TE 846 Accommodating Differences in Literacy Learners. I hoped the course would help me to further understand literacy development and how to support my students.

            One of the concepts I learned that stood out the most was how “Vocabulary knowledge is strongly correlated to reading comprehension,” (Stahl, 2003). During the third grade reading intervention time at my current school, I teach a small group of students who have an intervention plan required by the state. Using the new information I learned about the power of vocabulary and comprehension I began to integrate vocabulary instruction into my lessons. I get the eight words from our basal series as each story has focus vocabulary words, which appear in the story. Each classroom introduces the words but I take it a step further and use a template for teaching the words. Together with the students we look at how the words are defined and described in the basal. Then we record a definition for each word and students write a sentence and draw a picture to demonstrate the word. My goal is to increase the students’ vocabulary to improve their comprehension by building upon the words from our weekly story. I learned its important to not forget the influence vocabulary has on comprehension.

            My fellow grade level readers are not the only ones who benefit from vocabulary instruction. During the same reading intervention time, some of my students go to another classroom to word specifically on vocabulary. These students have demonstrated on assessments they are reading above grade level and that an area they need to improve is vocabulary. Thus this group learns about root words, prefixes, suffixes, how to use a dictionary and more. Research as found that “morphology was related to reading comprehension […], and became more important as students grew older. Students with greater understanding of morphology also have higher reading comprehension scores,” (Kieffer, 2007). Although I do not teach this group, the research I learned in TE 846 makes me feel confident these students are further developing their comprehension by learning about words parts.

          Another aspect of vocabulary instruction I had not considered would assist in reading comprehension is the vocabulary lessons from the reading series I teach from. These lesson include skills such as prefixes, how to use a dictionary and synonyms. While I knew these were important skills for students to know it was after this course I concluded these skills help students to read and understand the text. To be able to gain meaning from the text they need skills and strategies to determine the meaning of unknown words. By learning what prefixes such as im- mean, students can form meaning of words. It amazes me how one quote from an article could change my perception on vocabulary and its importance. In conclusion, TE 846 taught me much about vocabulary and how it impacts comprehension and as a result I have implemented and support vocabulary instruction.

Closing Thoughts

          When I first began to reflect upon my course work, what I learned, and how it impacted my teaching I struggled. I didn’t see clear examples until I went back and looked at the material I read and projects I created in these courses. I realized that I had made changes to my teaching, without noticing, based on what I had learned. I now explicitly teach vocabulary after realizing its connection to comprehension. I value the background of my ELLs. I now see there are different types of knowledge in math. These are three concepts which I now find traces of in my practice. All in all, my course work has made influenced changes in my teaching practice.

Works Cited

Screen Shot 2019-03-17 at 6.30.56 PM.png
bottom of page